Green News
According to our government, nuclear power is the way forward for our future energy requirements. The supporters of nuclear power say it is far more environmentally friendly than many other forms of electricity generating methods. Nuclear power is cleaner, produces less carbon emissions and will eliminate our need to import energy, so the theory goes.
But Greenpeace have dismissed the green arguments for nuclear power as "like taking up smoking to lose weight". Although the government has promised to invest in renewable energy, this would not be sufficient to rule out the nuclear part of the equation. Do you think that nuclear energy has any part to play in a green Britain, or is the government simply ignoring alternatives that are just as effective?
[Via The Guardian]
Continue reading >>
Green News
There is a strong argument for introducing more renewable energy into the UK. Unfortunately some of these renewable energy projects will damage the local landscape and its wildlife. There is a big push by our government, notably by The Environment Secretary, David Miliband, Welsh Secretary Peter Hain and Trade and Industry Secretary Alistair Darling to make Britain the first country to derive most of its energy from the tides. One such project being promoted at the moment is to build a 10 mile barrage across the Severn estuary. This £14 billion project is being pushed a consortium of six companies called the Severn Tidal Power Group. It all sounds good, getting electricity from the tides, no carbon emissions, but…
[Via The Independent]
Continue reading >>
Columns & Opinion
Having munched his way through more food than he would like to admit in front of the TV on Cup Final Day, Gareth Kane considers the environmental implications of what we eat.
"Great stadium, tedious game" was the general verdict on Saturday's FA Cup drudge match at the new Wembley. My personal prediction - that the only goal would be scored by Gullit, Jose Mourinho's fugitive Yorkshire Terrier, diving out from his hiding place under Jose's coat, tearing across the field and diverting an innocuous Chelsea backpass into their own net - was as wide of the mark as Ronaldo's shooting.
From an eco point of view, the dullness of the (in)action was eclipsed by the huge amount of grub the fans worked their way through. As reported in the Guardian (and quoted below), in the 2004 final, Manchester United and Millwall fans at the match put away 37,624 sausage rolls, pies or pasties, 26,965 sandwiches, 17,998 hot dogs, 12,780 burgers, 11,502 packets of crisps and 23,909 portions of chips. This made up a large proportion of the ecological footprint of the match as a whole.
Continue reading >>
Green News
The FA cup final at the new Wembley stadium is estimated to have left an environmental footprint 3,000 times the size of the pitch! Each fan travelling to the game and enjoying the culinary delights on offer would have a carbon footprint 10 times as large as the one they would have if they watched the game at home. Based on an analysis of the 2004 cup final by Dr Andrea Collins of Cardiff University, the environmental impact of such an event is massive. The major factors are the fans’ transport requirements and the huge amounts of processed foods they consume.
The environmental problem with processed food is the fact that it is processed. The industrial process of making and distributing the food is causing the damage to the environment.
[Via The Guardian]
Continue reading >>
Columns & Opinion
While our government is talking ‘green’ and doing little to ‘be green’, a major cause of global warming goes unnoticed and virtually unreported. I knew that deforestation was damaging the environment, but I never knew it was as devastating as this. According to a fascinating article in The Independent today, just 24 hours of deforestation releases as much CO2 as 8 million people flying from London to New York. The figures in the article make very scary reading, for example, 2 billion tons of CO2 is released each year from deforestation and accounts for roughly a quarter of global emissions. 50 million acres of forest is destroyed every year. That’s an area the size of mainland UK.
[Via The Independent]
Continue reading >>
Columns & Opinion
How many of you watched ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’ recently on channel 4? If you did, you will remember the whole programme was an attempt to portray global warming as a purely natural phenomenon caused primarily by solar activity. Even more disturbing, was the film-makers attempt to convince us the theory that global warming is being caused by human activity was false and basically a lie. Apparently we are all victims of a great big con.
Now it appears we were victims of a con. A con by the film-makers themselves. The programme has been referred to Ofcom, the regulatory watchdog, to consider a complaint by 37 scientists. The programme has been accused of misrepresenting the prevailing views and facts relating to global warming. Even one of the climate sceptics whose research work was used on the programme has accused the film-makers of broadcasting falsehoods.
[Via The Independent]
Continue reading >>
Columns & Opinion
Whichever political mast you nail your colours to, there is no doubt that Anthony Seddon Blair has dominated the political landscape for the last 10 years. And with everyone expecting him to announce his final bow this week, you won't be able to switch on your telly or open a paper without getting a lengthy run down of his 'legacy'. I've never been one to demur from plonking my lazy backside on a crowded bandwagon, so I thought I would add to the acres of verbiage and review his track record on the environment.
On the plus side there's been the landfill tax, variable car tax based on emissions and the climate change levy. The first of these started off a bit ineffective, but with a steady annual increment and a recent switch from funding local community based projects to funding major waste reduction initiatives such as Envirowise, the Waste Resources Action Programme and the National Industrial Symbiosis Programme, you could argue it has transformed the industrial waste picture. On the other hand, the car tax proposals rewarded the virtuous rather than penalising idiots in Chelsea tractors and the Climate Change Levy had opt-outs for the big energy users which rather undermined the whole idea.
Continue reading >>