web metrics
Browse by:
Get daily news round-up

Yay or Nay: Bob Geldof's green, nuclear vision

bob%20geldof.jpgBob Geldof has never been one to shy away from courting controversy, and here he is, at it again in a blog launched by Lexus that is intended to debate the pros and cons of hybrid cars.

Sir Bob was brought in as a celebrity blogger by the car firm to kick off discussion on the more eco-friendly direction that Lexus wants to take. But so far he's chosen to use the platform most notably for putting forward his own pro-nuclear opinions, which he's given a green slant. On meeting C02 reduction targets he brands renewable energy initiatives such as wind farms "Mickey Mouse" and insists that "to really help the planet, we have to go nuclear, fast".

And on hybrid card, the very subject he was drafted in to discuss: "The reason I drive a hybrid car is simple: to avoid London's congestion charge. I simply couldn't stand paying the f**king thing."

So what do you think: is Geldof bravely putting across a realistic solution to a doomed planet, or completely out of order?

Posted by AbiSilvester on December 12, 2007 in Green News, Yay or Nay | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://shinymedia.headshift.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/71294

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yay or Nay: Bob Geldof's green, nuclear vision:

Comments

Neither we nor the planet would be doomed
even if a wicked fairy made fission
impossible later this afternoon,
but Geldof is right:
with fission, it's a lot easier.
With fission plants we don't take
the chance of another Chernobyl, and
we don't commit ourselves to
being caretakers of dangerous wastes
for longer than democracies have existed.

Posted by: G.R.L. Cowan, hydrogen-to-boron convert | December 13, 2007 9:14 PM

So Bob wants a nuclear winter for a future eh? Nuclear power is not green, it's not clean and it's not safe - so how is that a positive step? It isn't. That's the problem when 'pop' stars become banner-waving politicians, they really don't know what they're talking about. Perhaps Sir Bob should stick to what he does best, singing off key in a fourth rate 'pop' band....

Posted by: Jack | December 15, 2007 9:00 PM

Maybe Sir Bob has found a good deal on a cheap power plant.Nothing wrong with that is there?

Posted by: ROBIN RICHARD | December 16, 2007 5:07 PM

Although I agree with the need for nuclear power too, the older Geldof gets, the more he makes Jeremy Clarkson look pink.

If (alleged) millionaire Geldof resents paying £8 a day tax on his car, he is either bullshitting people about the "success" of his business ventures, or is a truly miserable human being. I assume he doesn't give the £8 a day to Third World causes.

Geldof would have declined into his dotage and hasbeenhood thirty years ago without his one great idea of Live Aid. Unfortunately one great idea shouldn't give you a free pass either to sainthood or the opportunity to mouth off on any subject that passes in front of you (and as we see from Lexus, generally those with a fee attached). Geldof, as the old saying goes, would attend the opening of an envelope. Unfortunately that suits lazy British journos, who find it far easier to insult the intelligence of their readers by passing off Geldof's ramblings as news, or simply to rewrite Greenpeace press releases than to write a balanced story about something for which there are no easy answers like nuclear power.

Posted by: Nick G | January 11, 2008 11:02 AM

Post a comment