Yay or nay: Will UHT milk save the planet?
I'm no scientist, but I always thought UHT stood for 'ultra high temperature', a belief that a quick google-search backs up. So I can't help being sceptical from the start about the government claim that switching from fresh to UHT milk would benefit the environment. Doesn't all that heating involve quite a lot of carbon emissions?
More to the point, anyone who's ever been on a camping trip, visited a hot country or purchased a cheap coffee from a vending machine will testify, UHT milk tastes pretty manky. At best, it's a last resort; at worst, a good incentive to go vegan.
How will using bad milk stop global warming? The theory is that if supermarkets stock mostly long-life, UHT milk, it will require less refrigeration, thus cutting down on carbon emissions.
Britain is one of the largest consumers of fresh milk in Europe, with it making up 93% of sales. This clearly means more refrigeration (of milk) is needed in this country than elsewhere, but will targeting milk really be the answer?
Many farmers, already beset by fears over Foot and Mouth disease and Bluetongue are, uneasy about the proposals, which were leaked today by the Times. They suspect a hidden agenda, and many have asked why the finger is not being pointed at other industries. I can't help wondering the same. What do you feel about green tactics being used to try and change our habits on the white stuff? If you think the government have a case, would you be prepared to renounce fresh milk?
















Post a comment
Required fields marked by *