web metrics
Browse by:
Get daily news round-up
Transport & travel

More on the Fitch Fuel Catalyst

I got mail today from Christopher Alonso, who's installed a Fitch Fuel Catalyst. In his own words:

Today I installed a Fitch fuel catalyst on my 1995 GMC K1500. The truck gets approximately 16 mpg with mixed driving. It used to get 18mpg, but 16 is very good considering that it has 178,000 miles and it uses a rather crude fuel delivery system. (Throttle Body Injection). Most cars sold today get the same mileage that was being delivered 10- 15 years ago, they just put out less emissions. I used the inline kit, and did the whole job out in my driveway. The kit was not specific for my vehicle and the hoses provided were too small for my fuel lines. The instructions are inconsistant; the online version tells you to locate the unit 8" away from heat and electromagnetic fields in a vertical position, my instructions did not state that. I placed it on the inside of the frame rail after the fuel filter. Overall it was a pain it the butt to install on this application. Had I done it at work on my lift (I work on Mercedes) there would have been much less swearing. I hope this thing works. I'll keep you informed.

What, you may ask, is a Fitch Fuel Catalyst? It's the most interesting gasoline saver I've ever seen.

According to the company, the Fitch reduces emissions by up to 25% and improves fuel efficiency by up to 20%. (This is considered odd since usually emission reduction and efficiency improvement are exactly the same percentage.) I know a Fitch dealer who has been loaning them to taxi drivers, and the taxi drivers are starting to buy them because they really do save on petrol, especially in older vehicles. Fitch has had the thing tested excruciatingly by everybody from Esso Europe to the American EPA and it comes out at worst harmless, and at best it does all of the aforementioned good stuff, plus it keeps petrol from spoiling, so it can be stored for years instead of simply weeks.

If you have any Fitch experiences, please do send me an email (positive or negative) as this is an extremely attractive gadget. Many scientists insist it can't work... but honestly, I trust the taxi drivers who've used them more than I trust theoreticians who simply assert they're impossible. [GT]

Product page: Fitch Fuel Catalyst

Related story: Fitch fuel catalyst

Posted by on July 11, 2006

Comments

I'd trust the scientists on this one. The combustion of carbon fuel is very well understood, unlike the human body where there is much larger scope for alternative ideas, theories and new discoveries. I looked into these and actually bought one a while ago (different brand). If they actually worked then car makers would incorporate the technology. Good economy adds to the value and is environmentally sound, this allows car makers to charge a premium a la toyota prius hybrid!

Check out fuel saving devices on wikipedia or have a look at this link http://www.fuelsaving.info/

Posted by: NickF | July 23, 2006 1:35 PM

"If these things really worked car makers would put them on at the factory..." Blah, blah, blah...NOT!

The auto makers won't even look at this tech, though it's been proven time and again over the past 15+ years.

This is a no-brainer, true multi-metal catalyst. By definition, a catalyst doesn't get used up in the chemical (in this case, electrochemical) process.

My brother has one on his 2005 Navigator and one on his 2005 Sierra 1500HD. The Navigator has improved about 1.5mpg and the Sierra is even better. That's nothing to sniff at, considering the price of gas.

I put the drop-in on my riding mower, and it's a whole new mower...better running, uses less gas, etc.

A friend put one on his '96 Yukon, and it's gone up over 3mpg! I am putting one on my '96 Yukon ASAP!

My HVAC contractor friend is installing them on furnaces and boilers for homes and businesses.

Two very large trucking companies I know are looking at this tech, and tons of small ones and owner/operators have been using them for years.

Don't poo-poo something just because you don't understand it. And don't expect mainstream America to do your homework for you. Europe, Australia, China and Russia are already using these things on a large-scale basis and getting real results.

I'm 150% U.S. patriot, but the good ol' USA is often the last to take up new technology, unless they can make a buck doing it. This tech will reduce fuel consumption... don't expect big business to get too excited about that.

Do your own research. Try one (A Fitch, not any other brand...Fitch is the only one I know of that doesn't leech into the fuel). Put it on and if it doesn't impress you, send it back. But don't say ridiculous things like "If it really worked, blah, blah, blah..."

Posted by: Damon | September 25, 2006 3:14 PM

"Up to" means anything from negative infinity up to some number. "At least" means anywhere from that number to positive infinity. If they start say "at least" on their boxes and put a gaurentee on that, I'll buy one, but THEY WON'T because their full of you know what and all the fitch shills in the world saying otherwise won't change that fact.

Posted by: Tas | October 10, 2007 8:55 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Related Posts with Thumbnails