Nike's ethical shoes
No, we've not turned into The Onion for the day - Nike really has released a range of greener and more ethically-sourced shoes. It's called Nike Considered, and consists of five pieces of footwear - a boot, climbing shoe, trainer, open-backed trainer and sandals - designed by Richard Clarke. Apparently the shoes are easier to recycle, solvent use is reduced by over 80% compared with Nike’s "typical products" and all the materials are sourced within 200 miles of the unnamed factory. Nike also reckons the Boot, Rock and Gem shoes create 63% less waste than a comparable Nike light hiking shoe. All of which is commendable whatever you think of Nike, but does beg the question: how much chemical crap is it sticking in its "typical products"? And more importantly, why does most of the range - with the exception of the pretty cool Gem shoe, pictured - look so damn hippyish? The boot and rock shoe are on sale from Footpatrol in the UK.
















How ethical are Nike? When their shoes are produced using sweatshop labour in the third world? What kind of person wears these shoes with that knowledge?
Posted by: micawber | April 1, 2005 9:39 PM